Happy Easter everyone. I had plans to share my thoughts on Isla Dewar’s Secrets of a Family Album today as I’m half way through – but I’ve decided instead to post some answers to a few questions that my fellow readers have posed this week – for part of the enjoyment of reading is sharing bookish thoughts with others right?

How much information should be revealed in a book review?

Kerrie over at Mysteries in Paradise wrote a post about how much information she reveals in a review – I was very interested to read this as I’ve been battling with how much information I should include in mine. I think once I’ve finished a book there are two things I’d like to achieve:

  1. Encourage others to read the book (or not) – this requires a review giving enough detail to encourage another reader to pick up a copy – but not enough to spoil it for them
  2. Understand my thoughts and feelings about the book – and discuss this with others who have read the book already

The problem with this is that the second *requirement* requires spoilers – which I wouldn’t want would-be readers to see.

So far I have just been tackling the review – but in future reviews I want to get stuck into the discussion too. So here’s what I’m thinking – I’ll include both elements in my posts – the review at the start and then the discussion at the end – with a *spoiler warning* in between. This way I can achieve both aims – and hopefully start a discussion in the comments.

What do you think – can this work or would you tackle it differently?

What do your books say about you?

The Literate Kitten commented on an article she read about whether you should keep unread books on your bookshelves – what an odd thing for someone to write an article about – I mean where else would you keep them? The author suggests your office or your bedside table – which I think is silly. I have a couple of  shelves of unread books and several bookcases full of books I’ve read and enjoyed and if you ask me that is perfectly normal – and sensible!

Apparently bookshelves convey the type of person you would like to be and hence should only house unread books. I would prefer my bookshelves to be less pretentious and show the person that I am – based on those books I have enjoyed and decided to keep.

I think my books – both read and unread – show that I like a challenge but enjoy creature comforts (you’ll find new authors, classics and prize winners alongside chick-lit and favourite authors) and that I strive for order (unread are alphabetical, read are grouped by author in chronological order). And given the sheer number of books and the fact that they find a home in pretty much every room of the house I think you’ll discover that I am a book collector – I love to surround myself with books and the promise of being transported to some far off place – as much as I love to read them!

What do your books say about you? Post in the comments and then head over to Literate Kitten and let LK know too.

What books would you save from a fire?

Jill at the Magic Lasso has been reading an essay by Anna Quindlen which prompted the question “what books would you save from a fire?” I’m sure this is supposed to prompt us to list out our favourite books – in which case I’d have to suggest anything by Anita Shreve, My Sister’s Keeper by Jodi Picoult and Big Stone Gap by Adriana Trigiani. Then add to that The Book of Lost Things by John Connolly.

Of course the problem with this list is that books are replaceable – unless they were given as a gift by a loved one and hold special memories. In which case if there were a fire I wouldn’t give my books a second thought – I’d be more worried about saving my husband, my cats and my iMac – which contains all of my photographs and storytelling pages.

What books would you save from a fire? Head over to the Magic Lasso and let Jill know.

Tags: ,